SGI Insurance - Beyond An Accident
Protesting SGI and Dr. Allison Falconer [Dentist] for my loss of Civil Rights under the Privacy Act
CITIZENS OF SASKATCHEWAN HAVE LOST LEGAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS TO SGI
On June 05, 2002 I attended to Dr. Allison Falconer - now owner of Gentle Dental - in Regina Saskatchewan [Canada] and the following INJUSTICE took place:
“…As I [Don Muntean] arrived to the dental chair I noted that all the dental instruments etc., were already in place and after brief introductions - YOU - Dr. Allison Falconer administered a local into my palate near the extraction site - telling me that it was - ‘a very good product’ - [stating that the particular brand used worked well to eliminate bleeding] [note: like epinephrine] - we then discussed the use of N2O [nitrous oxide] and I was told by YOU that YOU did not wish to use N20 - stating I - ‘should be fully aware’ - for this procedure.
We then discussed a prior extraction [of a similar upper tooth on the right side] - that that dentist [different clinic] was very easily able to remove that tooth whole - I then asked if I could have the extracted tooth and YOU [while looking at me with some peculiar attending behaviors] stated - ‘we will see’.
During the next eight to ten minutes - while ‘waiting for the local to take effect’ - YOU and YOUR assistant went [a short distance] to the back of the clinic - where I observed a wall - open on the right - YOU and YOUR assistant were standing at the open end of this ‘wall’ - talking to [this so-called] "Lyle Patel" and - looking out at me.
A moment [or so] later I noticed that some outside light appeared behind the wall - [apparently when a rear door was opened] - at that point YOU and YOUR assistant and [this so-called] "Lyle Patel" - disappeared behind the wall - a moment later - the outside light disappeared [apparently when the door was closed] and then yet another moment later - YOU and YOUR assistant returned to the dental chair - and [Lyle Patel?] - was not seen again!
As YOU and YOUR assistant were walking the short distance toward the chair - I noted YOUR assistant was carrying a stainless steel dish containing a pair of flexible tweezers and two white spheres [each] around the size of a pea [rolling around noisily like marbles in the dish] - YOUR assistant then held the dish right out in-front of me - YOU took it from her and placed it somewhere on the counter - behind the chair.
Then YOU commenced to extract the decaying tooth - the tooth was not badly decayed and could have been easily extracted whole - instead YOU moved it slightly back and forth - after failing to drill a ‘crevice along the gum line’ so as to have something to grip onto. YOU then claimed that YOU would have to crush my tooth and drill it out - YOU thus used your dental pliers to quickly crush my tooth - followed with extensive drilling - for around fifteen minutes - I became aware that this included drilling into the area over the tooth [ultimately you were drilling into the sinus area] - to the left of the extraction socket. Following YOUR excessive drilling - recall that YOU stated there wasn’t any bleeding at all to speak of!
Then YOU picked up the stainless steel dish noted earlier [I heard the spheres rolling around again - as it was handed to the assistant] and handed it to YOUR assistant who then again - held it out in front of me - under my face.
YOU then reached for the flexible tweezers [within the dish] and at this point YOUR hand was trembling badly - YOU then reached into the dish with the flexible tweezers to grasp the first sphere - as YOU lifted it out [trembling and grasping it with excessive pressure] I observed that it was indeed white, solid and, semi-glossed - around the size of a pea - due to the position of the sphere in the tweezers and the excessive pressure of the flexible tweezers upon the smooth solid round surface - the sphere popped out of the tweezers - and it fell to the floor and bounced a couple of times - rolling to the baseboard at the right of the chair.
I then sat fully upright in the dental chair and asked YOU what it was - as YOU reached for the second sphere YOU quickly stated that it was - ‘for clotting’.
I again sat back [silently questioning YOUR excuse - considering the lack of any bleeding - due to the so-called ‘very good local’ YOU administered!] - YOUR hand still shaking - YOU [supposedly] placed the second sphere into the open extraction socket with the tweezers - [actually it was placed into the LOWER SINUS over the tooth right next to the open socket] - this was quickly followed by packing gauze within the extraction socket - I was told to leave the gauze pack in place…
I then left the dental chair and looking down at the first white sphere - which had fallen to the floor - while I walked by it; I wondered what it really was and where it really came from…” (excerpted from September 13, 2004 letter to Dr. Falconer)
Copy of digital X-ray:
SHALL THE NEW SASK PARTY GOVERNMENT SOON RESOLVE THIS SGI/NDP IMPLANT ABUSE?
DR. FALCONER CAN AT LAST PRESSURE THE AGENCY WHO CONSCRIPTED THIS PROFESSIONALLY UNTOWARD JUNE 05, 2002 PROCEDURE - PRESSURE THEM TO RESOLVE IT [AND THUS END THIS LEGITIMATE PICKET!!].
THIS SO-CALLED MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL BETTER UNDERSTAND THAT THIS INTERNET PROTEST IS NOW EXPANDING TO OTHER SITES AND THERE IS ONLY ONE LEGITIMATE WAY TO END THIS.
------------------------------------------------------------
THURSDAY AUGUST 28, 2008 @ 5:03 P.M.
TODAY IT'S: 75 MONTHS AND 23 DAYS - WITH THIS SPY IMPLANT WITHIN MY SINUS...!
IT'S NOW OVER SIX YEARS WITH THIS IMPLANT - HOW LONG SHALL IT GO WITHOUT PROPER CLOSURE?
------------------------------------------------------------
SECTION 12 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms:
"Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment..."
Do NOT trust this UNETHICAL Dentist!!
It should be now considered that if this matter were untrue - would this internet protesting still be taking place after 39 MONTHS? Why hasn't Dr. Allison Falconer and SGI been able to obtain a LEGAL writ to close it down?
Dr. Allison Falconer and SGI cannot file an action within the civil courts - for an injunction to STOP MY INTERNET PROTEST.
The fact is Dr. Allison Falconer - who is essentially - a human rights violator - knows [it's even noted within her police statement] that if they go into any civil court for an injunction to close down this site or any other sites I create - they would be unable to get one.
In fact while trying to obtain a bogus peace bond - Dr. Allison Falconer was ultimately told by a provincial court judge that I have a right to protest her dental practice!Dr. Falconer knows civil courts decide evidence on a - balance of probability.
I also would then have the opportunity to file my own counter-suit - why hasn't this yet happened? Instead all the failed efforts to stop [with a peace bond process] my protest...In her original complaints to police in 2004-2005 Dr. Falconer more than once recored lies within her sworn police statements and pointing this out in a civil court would further trounce Dr. Falconer's credibility!Dr. Allison Falconer tried and failed in 2004 through 2005 in having the police charge me with liable under sections 298-299 of the criminal code of Canada.
If the Police had evidence that this protest was a liable they would have charged me long ago - the fact is - there are NO lies posted by me - EVERYTHING that is posted here happened - the incident is related systematically - the evidences are listed clearly.
It's unfortunate that in this protest I've had to publicize the name of the doctor who performed the untoward June 05 2002 procedure but - that's the way protests operate.
DR. FALCONER CAN AT LAST PRESSURE THE AGENCY WHO CONSCRIPTED THIS PROFESSIONALLY UNTOWARD JUNE 05, 2002 PROCEDURE - PRESSURE THEM TO RESOLVE IT [AND THUS END THIS LEGITIMATE PICKET!!].
This very unprofessional dentist is UNDOUBTEDLY feeling pressured by this legitimate protest...
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Some answers to questions regarding this:
Q: When did you first contact the clinic [where Dr. Allison Falconer was working under contract] for dental services?
A: On May 08, 2002 I visited the clinic to book an appointment - [to remove the noted tooth - as well as a lower wisdom tooth on the left] following calling them a couple days previous to that.
When I went to the clinic on May 08, 2002 to book the appointment there was some question of whether I had 'coverage' - the first entry on my dental chart is; "08/05/02 No Coverage" - I was on social services and - I had coverage.
Q: When did you return to the clinic?
A: I returned to the clinic on May 29, 2002.
Q: Were you seen by a dentist and - was Dr. Allison Falconer - the 'first dentist' to attend you at this clinic?
A: NO - I was seen by a different dentist [a very professional individual] - this Doctor noted 'swelling' and recorded it on the dental chart - a prescription for antibiotics was issued and I was told I would have to return in 5-6 days.
Q: When was the appointment booked for - were you seen again by this first dentist?
A: This is an important point - I was booked in for 3-330 pm on June 05, 2002 - when I arrived to the clinic I asked about the 'first dentist' and - I was told that she no longer worked there!
I was then informed that I would instead be seen by - Dr. Allison Falconer.
It sure appears odd that this 'first dentist' had an appointment booked with me - and then isn't working there a week later - [now in Saskatoon] - why did she leave me with the expectation that I would be seen by her again - I wonder - was this dentist's exit from that clinic related to any refusal to comply with the 'procedure'?
Q: Incidentally - did you have the wisdom tooth extracted?
A: NO. I was told [on June 05, 2002] I needed an appointment with a dental surgeon - of course I didn't see them over this - not even since then - I have had to live through this lower wisdom tooth - ROTTING AWAY - on its own - all that is left now is a hole and roots [and - it's STILL that way as of today!].
Q: When was the first contact with the clinic/dentist after the June 05, 2002 procedure?
A: I first called the clinic looking for an explanation on August 07, 2002 - two months and two days after the procedure.
During the first call - I asked the office manager what was placed in the extraction socket - the answer was 'gelfoam' - I then asked if 'gelfoam' would pop out of tweezers and bounce/roll on the floor [and make a loud 'tap' sound - like a solid object when hitting the floor] and the office manager stated - "no" it wouldn't - I then stated that it wasn't 'gelfoam' - because one of the spheres did pop out the tweezers and fall to the floor bouncing [making a noise] and rolling to the baseboard. The office manager refused further discussions and hung up.
Q: What is gelfoam?
A: Gelfoam is a soft sponge-like hemostatic agent that is used for clotting an extraction socket - this is a brief professional description:
"...The most commonly used least expensive hemostatic agent is absorbable gelatin SPONGE (Gelfoam, Pfizer). Gelfoam sterile compressed SPONGE is a PLIABLE surgical hemostat...purified gelatin...capable of absorbing and holding within its meshes many times its weight in whole blood...designed to be inserted in the dry state...Gelfoam forms a scaffold for the formation of a blood clot. Gelfoam...aid in primary closure for large extraction sites...is placed into the socket and RETAINED WITH A SUTURE...It is more important to note that when using hemostatic agents, the materials are place in the socket and SUTURED to the gingival margin surrounding the extraction site. This will assure that they are secure..."
http://www.drted.com/index.html.bak2/Post%20extraction%20complications.html
This is what Gelfoam looks like - [it's not at all like a solid sphere!]:
Actually no 'gelfoam' was inserted - only the sphere and some gauze.
Dr. Allison Falconer did not suture or 'stitch' the extraction socket.
It should be noted that on June 05, 2002 Dr. Allison Falconer wrote on my dental chart - "gelfoam placed" [the manager quoted this on August 07, 2002].
Dr. Allison Falconer recorded nothing about the crushing of the tooth etc., for her to record that she had placed - [allegedly] 'gelfoam' - but nothing about the rest of the procedure [like packed gauze, injected local etc.,] is suspicious - heck even the idea of recording 'that' information at all - is redundant - she may have well thus recorded - 'turned on drill'!
She also recorded - "Falconer for Lyle Patel" - on my dental chart - this "Lyle Patel" she now claims to be a dental student.
If "Lyle Patel" was a fourth year dental student in 2002 - where is his practice now - why is he not listed online? The reason is - there was/is no "Lyle Patel dental student".
Actually - I think that this 'person' must have been someone else - who IS well acquainted with and - related to Dr. Allison Falconer [perchance was it her husband - with among tickets - a Masters in Biomedical Engineering?].
Notwithstanding Dr. Allison Falconer's very obvious lies - [as noted about the gelfoam and this so-called Lyle Patel being some dental student who broke my tooth and - her being called to complete his extraction] - one MUST ask - WHAT EXACTLY - are these June 05, 2002 entries on my dental chart - ["gelfoam placed" and "Falconer for Lyle Patel"] - factually recording?
It should be noted that the "referred to oral surgeon" entry was related to lower number 17 - [as evidenced on the dental record above]. I had two teeth to be extracted - number 17 was a lower left wisdom tooth - It was claimed that she couldn't do that extraction. Dr. Allison Falconer later lied in her police statement - stating that the referral was related to the extraction of the noted upper number 13 - [as evidenced on the dental record above].
Q: Did you call again?
A: I called again on August 18, 2002 and August 23, 2002 - during these calls - there were evasions [and lies] - and very quickly - they hung up the phone each time.
I did not keep calling - for the reason that they would profile me as harassing them.
I again called on January 07, 2004 and still the same [non]response - I called again on January 28, 2004 to speak with clinic manager - they hung up.
I called again on February 02, 2004 - hung up again.
Q: What did you do following this?
A: I sent a written request to the clinic on April 01, 2004 to request my dental chart/medical records - under the newly proclaimed [federal] Personal Information Protection Electronic Documents Act [PIPEDA].
Q: What was their response?
A: On April 06, 2004 Dr. Allison Falconer and the clinic replied [with letter]:
They sent NO information - they wrote instead; - “…been in communication with the College of Dental Surgeons for Saskatchewan and the Regina City Police…” - and that; “…we have been advised to direct you to send all letters of complaint an concern to the College of Dental Surgeons for Saskatchewan…” - they also stated that I should not contact them again.
The clinic failed to provide any information [at that time] as outlined within the PIPEDA disclosure provisions.
Q: What did you do following this reply?
A: They claimed that I had to go to the college of dental surgeons to get access to information [dental chart] - and the college wanted me to first 'file a complaint' and - sign an outrageous legal release - I refused.
On April 19, 2004 I filed a review/complaint under s. 11 of the PIPEDA with the Privacy Commissioner of Canada.
The Privacy Commissioner of Canada replied with a letter on May 17, 2004 giving a citation of s. 13(2)(b) of the PIPEDA:
“…the complaint could more appropriately be dealt with, initially or completely, by means of a procedure provided for under the laws of Canada, other than this part, or the laws of a province.”
Q: What did you do following this reply?
A: On June 05, 2004 I filed a review with the Provincial Information and Privacy Commissioner [the commissioner] under s. 42(1) of the Health Information Protection Act [HIPPA].
Q: What was the subsequent process?
A: The clinic/Dr. Allison Falconer and the college of dental surgeons were told that access to information legislation govern disclosure of medical records - not the college's complaint process with its - 'legal release'.
This is what the HIPPA outlines as personal health information:
"In this Act:
(m) “personal health information” means, with respect to an individual, whether living or deceased:
(ii) information with respect to any health service provided to the individual;
(iv) information that is collected:
(A) incidentally to the provision of health services to the individual;.."
Dr. Allison Falconer [or whomever the original 'trustee' is that is in custody of the information] has a responsibility under s. 32 of the HIPPA to provide me with copies of the records and information – INCIDENTAL INFORMATION they would've had to have collected/recorded in connection to the June 05, 2002 incident.
With s. 35 of the HIPPA Dr. Allison Falconer [we later learned] had/has a responsibility to respond to my access request - openly accurately and completely – which meant if they were not transferring the request to another trustee - they then had either to inform me that ‘the information does not exist’ – as per s. 36 of the HIPPA – or to refuse the request - as per s. 36 of the HIPPA and - setting out the provisions as outlined in s. 38 of the HIPPA - upon which any refusal is founded.
None of these provisions were followed.
All-be-it after a protracted process - the clinic had to release three pages of documents.
On these pages there is a final [messy] handwritten note entered on April 14, 2004 [CDSGI] - their explanations became disputed by the commissioner - in a letter to the clinic dated August 19, 2004 [following a visit to the clinic by a FOIP Portfolio Officer to review records and answers already given] we see the commissioner note to the clinic:
"The abbreviation on the last line on the third page refers to “FAXES/COPIES OF LETTERS TO…” Canadian Dental Insurance (an insurer). We note that on July 28, 2004 you had indicated to the writer [Gary Dickson] that the abbreviation referred to the Saskatchewan College of Dental Surgeons. We understand now that July 28th information is inaccurate."
Following this the clinic replied [August 23, 2004] to the commissioner - [seemingly] very defensively - that the abbreviation was "CDSPI" - the dental insurance company.
As a matter of reference - just compare it with the "P" in the word "copies" [in the noted dental record above] - that actually confirms clearly - it's not a "P" - it's a "G".
In this August 23, 2004 letter the Manager of the clinic also wrote:
“…I would suggest that you contact Dr. Allison Falconer…She was directly involved with what transpired…”:
The April 14, 2004 entry is clear evidence of the manager [preparing to reply to my PIPEDA information request] following the provisions of section 9(2.1) of the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act.
Learn more about the process surrounding section 9(2.1) of the PIPEDA:
Dr. Allison Falconer has not followed 'access to information procedures' and - thus deny this nor does she [correctly] explain what 'is' seen in her records.
Q: What happened following this process?
A: The commissioner engaged what process he could at that time - I found vindication on some points and Mr. Dickson noted that they were now - "boxed in".
After this I offered the dentist 'full civil/criminal immunity' - to tell the truth [September 08, 2004] - but no - she refused.
Q: What did you do to corroborate your claims - what medical professionals did you engage?
A: After the procedure on June 05, 2002 I went through much anguish - psychological emotional [and physical - in the area drilled out] AND - there was a sense of extreme fear - that I had to shake - so in November 2002 I mustered up enough courage to go to another dentist and have an X-RAY - an X-RAY that was to be developed in 10 minutes - suddenly was to take three days - when I got it - it was too small and blurry to see anything.
Q: What did you do then?
A: Suffered with the whole matter - until 2004 - when I again went to another local dentist - this time he wouldn't let me have the X-RAY.
Then I went to yet another dentist in August 2004 - [and I due to the pain was of the impression that the implant was in the roots of the adjacent tooth] - during the visit to the last dentist it was confirmed by X-RAY that there was nothing in the roots of the tooth - but there was something in the sinus area over it.
Q: What did you do following this?
A: I made an appointment with the [singular] office of dental surgeons to have the X-RAY reviewed and to have additional X-RAYS and I wanted a CT Scan as well.
Q: What happened with that specialist's appointment?
A: I attended to this office and the dental surgeon [seemingly] refused to comment on the X-RAY and refused to take additional X-RAYS - he said they would order a CT scan for me. He did give me some dental "Gelfoam" [as I asked for it to confirm it's properties as opposed to the lie Dr. Allison Falconer has stated about the implant being "Gelfoam"].
Q: Did you have the CT scan? What did it show?
A: On December 10, 2004 I had the CT scan at the hospital radiology department - the tech was asked if he saw what I showed 'him' in the X-RAY and he stated - 'yes' - but I wasn't permitted to view the scans at that time on the monitor.
Q: What happened following this?
A: The scans were sent to the radiologists to review and they noted in a report that there was nothing there.
Q: What happened following this report?
A: I noted that the report [on the top] has a template that records - the name of the 'family doctor' - the name of the 'ATTENDING doctor' - the name of the 'referring doctor' and the name of the 'ordering doctor'.
So the only ones that should be entered with information on this report is - 'family doctor' and - 'referring doctor'.
Under 'ATTENDING doctor' it reads in uppercase:
"SPECIALIST OUT OF REGION"
The hospital said it's an error - not likely - 'attending doctor' would be an emergency room or an in-hospital doctor - none of which were engaged here.
What to speak of it 'not' being a name entered - thus - do I take it that there was a - "SPECIALIST [from] OUT [side of] OF [the Regina health] REGION" in attendance during the CT scan - just who would not question this? Was it the 'medical director' from SGI? Who?
The hospital will not re-do the scans - the dental surgeon's office will not re-order scans - and the dental surgeon[s] even refused me a follow-up appointment to review the radiologist report - AND - they are the only dental surgeons in the city. [why I do not know - it may not have been in bad-faith on their part] I have NO problem with the dental surgeons office. The problem is Dr. Allison Falconer's and SGI's.
Q: What did you do following this?
A: What can I do?
Q: How do you know it is an RFID?
A: It isn't 'Gelfoam' [as claimed by Dr. Allison Falconer] that we see in the X-RAY and - it isn't a known dental appliance.
The location and the appearance indicate that it is some kind of a listening device - it most certainly is a transponder.
Q: Have you called police?
A: Yes I called the police [August 2004] - they didn't take me serious. As a matter of fact - on June 05, 2002 we did hear on the CTV 'News at Six' - that the RCMP 'were investigating [five people at] SGI' - is that connected to this? I hope so...
Q: What did you tell police when you were arrested for so-called phone harassment of Dr. Allison Falconer on October 05, 2004?
A: The police refused my statement - they put me in a jail cell for three hours.
Q: Did you resist police or in any manner blame them?
A: NO - in fact they treated me rather well - they even 'forgot' to get an arrest warrant prior to arresting me.
Q: Why do you think they refused your statement?
A: I do not know. Later I noted my protest flyer in the court disclosure records.
Q: How do you think the police got your flyer?
A: In early October of 2004 [following final refusal of dentist to disclose full truth in September] we began to protest at SGI head office and distribute flyer's that resemble the blog - first the city of Regina downtown security appear out of no-where and tell me that I cannot picket and pass out flyer's - I told them that they were incorrect and asked who their supervisor is.
While this went on - one of the city security 'agents' went over the street and was talking with SGI security 'agent' and - then the SGI 'agent' was on the cell phone - I questioned the remaining 'agent' about the scenario - and I was told - 'oh it's nothing'.
Then I proceed to go up the street and the security 'agent' tries to retain my presence - I continue walking - then I go to the opposite end of the block and I start to distribute flyer's to passers-by - and a police car pulls up.
The police officer came over and asked me to get into the car and I said no - 'you can talk to me in front of the people' who had just received the flyers - then he asked for my Identification and a flyer - I gave them over to the officer - the officer then entered the cruiser and was in there on the radio for about eight minutes - then the officer got out of the car and returned the flyer and Identification and told me that there was no problem with my distributing them.
I then gave the officer a copy of the flyer and offered my sincere thanks for not abusing my right to protest. That is how the police obtained my flyer/statement.
Of course - SGI wasn't impressed in the least.
Q: Why did the police [later] arrest you on October 05, 2004 - for so-called phone harassment?
A: Dr. Allison Falconer calculated a few [very non-threatening] calls from me - and then lied to police - who [quickly] reacted - to these lies - they later figured out her lies - as there was no arrest warrant - a standard procedure overlooked on purpose - to add ruin to her case? Of course - the charge was later 'stayed'.
Q: Why do you think Dr. Allison Falconer had you thus charged?
A: To prevent a picket outside her own NEW clinic - Dr. Allison Falconer was informed by letter in September 2004 that it would occur - thus she indeed learned from SGI that I was picketing at their head office and distributing flyers - thus the reality of my picketing her clinic with flyer distribution - became a sure thing.
Q: Did police print or photograph you?
A: NO
Q: Do you have any criminal record?
A: NO
Q: How many times have you been arrested?
A: Three times. First [in February 2003] for calling SGI to gain accountability and proper consideration [charges stayed] [police 'forgot' to get arrest warrant that time too] - second [in October 2004] arrested for calling Dr. Allison Falconer as noted [charges stayed] - third [in September 2005] when Dr. Allison Falconer called police to get a bogus peace bond after her first bogus charges were 'stayed' - I've been arrested three times in my life - and ONLY in asserting my rights and - as a result of SGI's and Dr. Allison Falconer's abuse of the justice system - to evade responsibility for their actions on June 05, 2002.
Q: Do you have any past history with violence etc.,?
A: NO - I have taken abuse all my life and this is just too much - I have been baited again and again - but with the mercy of God and some friends I shall dispose of this in a manner that is best for all - not just me - at the end of the day [in life] I look to 'concession rather than calculation' - but there is a limit to issues one can resign on.
Q: Did Dr. Allison Falconer accuse you of making physical threats?
A: Not according to her 'written' police statement [all of what she may have 'said' is unknown to me] - which itself has some ill-interesting points surrounding it.
Like for one - the date - her police statement is dated September 07, 2004 - however - I did NOT call her at her NEW clinic until September 10, 2004!
HOW did she complain to police - ahead of my calls and - ahead of my September 08, 2004 letter to her and the clinic - wherein I was offering criminal/civil immunity? [I hand delivered letter to clinic on September 08th with expectation they were to share it with Dr.Allison Falconer]
I made NO calls to the clinic or Dr.Allison Falconer from February 02, 2004 - until September 10, 2004 - I called then - because I wanted to know their decision [about the September 08, 2004 offer of immunity].
It should be [here] noted that I only called Dr. Allison Falconer - 'for the first time' - on September 10, 2004 - after speaking with the manager of the clinic to discuss my September 08, 2004 letter which I hand delivered to the clinic on September 08th [not Dr. Allison Falconer's NEW clinic].
Naturally - I had/have NO wish to see Dr. Allison Falconer thus - I was trying to fax Dr. Allison Falconer her [second] letter but - I was unable - her office refused to turn on their FAX machine [they use a single phone line] - and of course - 'those calls' - were used against me - I later sent her [second] letter - via Canada post on September 13, 2004.
Dr. Allison Falconer's complaint to the police has me calling her office - from August 14, 2004 and - that is impossible.
In actuality the commissioner was still engaged in process with my HIPPA complaint - as a matter of attestation - it wasn't until August 23, 2004 that the clinic replied [by letter] to the commissioner that - Dr. Allison Falconer was "...directly involved with what transpired...".
Why are there these 'disparities of dates' within Dr. Allison Falconer's complaint regarding so-called telephone harassment from me?
Why [and how] did she go to police one day before I hand delivered the noted letter?
I speculate that she was given information gathered by SGI's SIU - that I was submitting this letter [information was not so serendipitously gained - from listening to conversations in our house in the days leading up to my writing/delivering the noted letter] - Dr. Falconer then manipulated a FALSE complaint to police - that I was making harassing calls - when I wasn't yet calling - at all.
Q: What have you done to gain public awareness?
A: Distribution of flyer's - sporadic pickets in the downtown area - the Internet message board system and - word of mouth.
Q: Did the [now former] Saskatchewan Government get a copy of the flyer?
A: Yes - on October 14, 2004 @ 9:15 PM I personally handed my flyer to [then] Premier Lorne Calvert - [outside a local hotel] in a chance encounter - while out distributing my flyer's to the general public.
Q: Was Mr. Calvert's office open/sincere in their handing of this matter?
A: NO - they hung up the phone if I called.
Q: When did you first call Mr. Calvert's office regarding the June 05, 2002 implant procedure?
A: I called his office and tried to explain what transpired in September 2002 - to no avail.
I've had quite the run-around by SGI - the office of the former NDP premier Lorne Calvert and the office of the former NDP ministers not-responsible for SGI. I'm not yet sure about our new Sask Party government.
The former NDP minister 'not-responsible for SGI' [Glen Hagel] refused to write a letter of denial of this June 05, 2002 incident.
Over the years I have written letters of complaint regarding SGI - to the various former NDP minister's responsible for SGI and there is this memo from SGI head office from March of 2002 - the memo reveals something interesting - picture the scenario as you read the underlined portions...
One writes a letter of complaint to the minister responsible for SGI about SGI and - SGI writes and signs the minister's response letters...
Also note the petty attitude in the information that is recorded.
That comment "...he falls just short of actual threats..." is very interesting - as SGI could never explain what that was supposed to mean. Telling the SGI staff that SGI would one day be closed down and that they ought to count their insurable hours - wasn't a threat.
I never made any threats to SGI staff and to be profiled as such by them is very disconcerting. Note that they let the name of another client appear [disparagingly] in my file as well.
The point here is this - how is it that one writes a letter of complaint to the minister responsible for SGI about SGI and SGI writes and signs the minister's response letters...this memo was written by an SGI head office 'customer support' staff member and - it was directed to the secretary of the then president Larry Fogg...
Q: In brief - what is the 'problem' with SGI?
A: This SGI matter started when I was riding my ten-speed pedal bike - minding my proper observance of road laws [on July 10, 1998] - and then 'slam' - a car hit me!
A negligent SGI customer was speeding and failed to stop at a marked stop.
I was struck on the right side head on - by a big steel 1960's model car!
I have post-traumatic arthritis in my ankles, hips, right elbow, right wrist and knees.
However - it was SGI and their ‘no-fault insurance’ client calculation which quickly became my REAL HELL.
This 'Oxford' file folder - from my SGI auto-injury file - was obtained through the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act [in 2002] - note the word "Dummy" under my name - it was SGI who wrote that!The audio sequence included on this video - was recorded on August 07, 2002 - a phone discussion with a senior SGI lawyer regarding this file folder. It should be noted that SGI was informed by me that I may record calls with them - this lawyer [Ken Lerner] and his 'boss' [president Larry Fogg] didn't care.
The two of them - along with the 'manager of personal injury' [John Schmidt] - are no longer employed at SGI [as of July 2004]. I wonder why? I know my experiences of them were not very nice.
JUST HEAR WHAT THEIR LAWYER HAD TO SAY ABOUT IT ON AUGUST 07, 2002 - ONE HAS TO WONDER WHAT THE TRUTH IS!
Now over TEN years later we have this SOCIALIST insurance company - STILL breaking the public trust without regard to morals and ethics.
Q: Do you blame the clinic or the dentist or hold a grudge for being manipulated into this procedure?
A: NO - I blame the government agency [SGI] who conscripted them into this procedure and - they know that.
I'm naturally upset with Dr. Allison Falconer for having me twice arrested - for her attempts to circumvent responsibility by trying to trounce my rights further and - for following through with the implant procedure - but why did she do it?
Q: Do you expect Dr. Allison Falconer to pay a civil/criminal liability?
A: YES - now I do.
Q: Do you expect the clinic owners [where it happened] to pay a civil/criminal liability?
A: NO....and - that is why the clinic name doesn't appear on this website.
They've been more respecting of my rights - for example - their clinic location was picketed by me - more than once in 2005 and - they didn't follow the same illegitimate course Dr. Allison Falconer did - with any bogus peace bond application - nor did they participate in the bogus peace bond application filed by Dr. Allison Falconer.
The clinic manager could have lied to me about the gelfoam when I called in August of 2002 - but didn't.
That is a major reason why I knew something untoward had taken place - I thus credit the clinic manager for giving me this very important truthful answer in August 2002.
Q: Do you expect the government of Saskatchewan [as being responsible for SGI] to pay a civil liability?
A: YES.
-----------------------------------------------------------------
NOTED CORRESPONDENCE SENT TO DR. ALLISON FALCONER IN 2004 OFFERING LEGAL IMMUNITY
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Delivered by Registered Mail
Attention to: Allison Falconer
On June 5, 2002 I attended to the [the clinic] to have a simple upper extraction - on the left side.
As you know - during this visit you embedded/implanted some type of extraneous device over the tooth [in the sinus] next to the one YOU extracted. [Please see enclosed X-Ray copies]
On Friday September 10, 2004 I telephoned your office and spoke with you – during this discussion – you’ve advanced a blatant and significant lie regarding - Lyle Patel.
Recall - you claimed that you - ‘completed the extraction that Lyle Patel started’.
You know very well that YOU crushed/broke the tooth [and you know why] and that Lyle Patel wasn’t at all present at the dental chair – [what to speak having so-called started the extraction procedure] – as noted in my April 01, 2004 Access to Information Request:
“…the dentist and the assistant were standing at the open end of this ‘wall’ - talking to some associate [?] and looking out at me…at that point the dentist and assistant and ‘the associate’ they were speaking with - disappeared behind the wall - a moment later…the dentist and the assistant returned to the chair…”
The “associate [?]” I noted was ‘Lyle Patel’ – and when YOU and YOUR assistant returned to the dental chair – Lyle Patel was not present – I never saw Lyle Patel there again.
Why have you NOW made this false statement - stating that Lyle Patel started the extraction procedure on me – and you know very well that he did NOT – and seemingly you are incapable of understanding your overly precarious situation – thus I must inform you - had Lyle Patel performed any procedure on me [and if in fact Lyle Patel is a dental student] – YOU would have to possess a waiver - which I would’ve had to have signed - for the giving of authorization for a so-called ‘student’ to work on me.
Of course - there exists no such record – because Lyle Patel - didn’t perform any procedures on me.
[NOTE: It's easily shown that 'unlicensed' Dental students cannot perform any dental procedures in Canada - what a transparent lie!]
I do not think YOU could’ve brushed aside any of the ‘details’ of that June 05, 2002 incident from your memory – certainly I couldn’t.
If somehow you have - read on - to help you ‘retrieve’ your memory:
[This edited part is the statement of events at the clinic on June 05, 2002 – this statement appears at the top of this website page]
…only a few moments later - I immediately removed the gauze pack and checked the extraction socket for this ‘clotting’ sphere – it was not there in the socket…”
It must be here noted that YOUR assertion that it was “gel-foam” which was placed into the extraction socket has also been refuted by our procurement of “gel-foam” and it doesn’t - in any manner - resemble the white ‘solid sphere’ which YOU inserted into my sinus - over the tooth - next to the extraction socket.
Of course YOU know that it wasn’t “gel-foam” that was inserted into the extraction socket - YOU also know that the sphere - is still within my sinus.
Dr. Allison Falconer - why ultimately did YOU unnecessarily crush the tooth - why was your hand so shaking when you were reaching for and placing the sphere(s) – why did you place so great a pressure on the tweezers - that YOU popped the first sphere out the tweezers?
I ask you - how do you live with the memory of performing this atrocious abuse of human rights – do YOU understand why I am so pained – do you understand what I have endured through since this serious assault?
On WHAT basis did YOU cooperate with ‘the party’ - who conscripted you?
You should be aware that it has already been established by the Privacy Commissioner that there [allegedly] exists no court order etc., thus it appears that YOU complied with the implant procedure - without a lawful basis to do so?
Dr. Allison Falconer - what advantage is there for - YOU - to continue with evasions and misinformation?
READ THE FOLLOWING VERY CAREFULLY AND NOTE THE - RARE OPPORTUNITY - THAT I AM [AGAIN] AFFORDING YOU:
The clinic informed me during a telephone discussion [on September 10, 2004] that you were “under contract” at their clinic - when you placed the noted sphere/implant into my sinus on June 05, 2002.
Additionally - we read in the clinic's letter to the Privacy Commissioner [dated August 23, 2004]:
“…I would suggest that you contact Dr. Allison Falconer…since…She was directly involved with what transpired…”
Please do NOT continue with any tergiversated approach and - despite the fact that there exist no judicious grounds - upon which to AGAIN extend you the - benefit-of-the-doubt - you’re getting just that.
Within the enclosed letter to Ms. xxxxxx - I’ve offered FULL immunity - from civil and/or criminal actions – that I have against the clinic and/or yourself - in connection to your participation in the implanting of my sinus with the noted sphere – of course - you repudiated my offer - on the telephone this last Friday.
With all due respect Dr. Allison Falconer - have you thought this through - do you understand how legal redress of this matter is going impact your reputation?
As you may appreciate – this June 05, 2002 incident - has no parallel in our society – any ‘professional’ conscripted into such an event - is sure to become ruined ‘professionally’.
Dr. Allison Falconer – without doubt - your ‘insurance company’ shall [predictably] refuse to cover your liability in this case – as by and large – insurance companies do not insure clients – for criminal assault and conspiracy.
Under these circumstances - I may have no other alternative - but to invoke my RIGHT to make a public disclosure and a picket/protest. Dr. Allison Falconer what would YOU have me do - to resolve this unparalleled injustice?
[...]
You can conceive that any public attention to this matter – will certainly have an adverse affect on your reputation and dental practice.
Additionally – I will be forced to seek for criminal charges to be entered on YOU - for your [untoward] participation in this criminal violation of myself – it was after all - YOUR HAND that crushed my tooth - YOUR HAND that drilled into areas you shouldn’t have and - it was YOUR HAND that placed the sphere into my lower sinus.
When this protest/picket commences [without further notice] the various newspaper and television media - will be provided all [connected] information that we possess [and that which we come to possess] – and we shall see to it that this matter remains in the media attention - for an extended time.
Of course - it is also my RIGHT to ‘post’ the enclosed X-RAY copies and placard/poster with a statement of the noted June 05, 2002 events - on Internet message boards – everywhere – providing [lasting] broad exposure to this fascist violation of [my] legal and civil rights.
As YOU can see from the enclosed X-RAY copies – the sphere that YOU implanted within my sinus on June 05, 2002 - is quite visible – and - we have additional evidences…
Thus it is here with this last offer of FULL immunity to you - that we shall establish once and for all - if YOU can avoid - a public denunciation for this matter.
This means that I am re-extending this GENEROUS offer to you ONE LAST TIME – should you again reject this GENEROUS offer of FULL immunity – full legal redress of this matter will naturally continue - as noted - and - at the end of the day - my Lawyer - [name removed] [with name removed Law Group] will be instructed to vigorously apply every possible legal procedure available - to bring your obvious dereliction - to criminal and civil accountability.
Dr.Allison Falconer - I am sure that YOU did not actually wish to do perform the implant procedure for SGI and/or others – and now YOU have YOUR final opportunity to demonstrate YOUR lack of direct complicity.
You can [and should] take advantage of - full immunity - both with the Commissioner and myself.
You owe it to yourself [and your future] to disclose the noted information to Mr. Dickson - the Privacy Commissioner – right now.
The Commission’s toll free number in Regina is - 1.877.748.2298 – do call now.
I will leave my offer [originally extended to you in the enclosed letter dated September 08, 2004] – open until to 4:00 PM tomorrow – [September 14, 2004].
Despite what SGI [and others] may have told you – neither you - nor the clinic - can be charged with any offenses - nor be sued by SGI and/or the government of Saskatchewan - for any compliance with the Privacy Commissioner - i.e.: for the providing of records and/or information to the Privacy Commissioner – as clearly noted in section 62 of the Health Information Protection Act:
“No person is liable to prosecution for an offence against any Act or regulation by reason of that person’s compliance with a requirement of the commissioner pursuant to this Act.”
Without doubt one can understand that yourself and the clinic are fearful to release the information relating to implanting the sphere for SGI [and/or others] due to a fear of legal reprisals from me – but clearly - you wish to do so – as [indirectly] evidenced by the foibles within your position throughout this process.
I’ll restate what I’ve wrote to the clinic [despite all that has happened] - I sincerely wish to see an occasion to think of yourself and 'the clinic' as good and honorable – as rejecting such abuses of human rights.
Dr. Allison Falconer - you and your loved ones have also to live in this Province [without rights too?] – failing your settlement of this matter with me – you will soon have many good reasons to wish not to have been the dentist - who set such an ill-precedent – do take serious this offer that I am extending to you.
______________________________________________
[...]
______________________________________________
All of which is respectfully submitted.
Donald J K Muntean
C.C.: Mr. Gary Dickson, Information and Privacy Commissioner
______________________________________________________________
Dear Fellow Citizens:
In Saskatchewan we have a GOVERNMENT INSURANCE COMPANY with an IN-HOUSE INVESTIGATION DEPARTMENT called the SIU.
This company known as SGI has been creating a massive computer DATA BASE - with EXTENSIVE INFORMATION on each and every person within this Province [not just insured drivers] - YOU NEED TO ASK - what EXTENSIVE INFORMATION does SGI’s DATA BASE contain about YOU and YOUR loved ones?
SGI is secretly INVESTIGATING into YOUR LIFE...
Did YOU know that residential wiretaps are now a routine procedure with SGI [with the assistance of the Provincial Justice Department?] - Dear Friend - YOU owe it to YOURSELF [and your loved ones] to know what is going on within this Province and to speak-out about losing YOUR RIGHTS.
Please SPEAK-OUT to our administrators and government leaders. It is time for us to reform SGI and end their making of ‘hopeless hostages’ of the citizens in this Province. All it took [for me to have this problem] was being hit by a car and then subsequently - a four year [now over NINE years] fight with SGI [over fair compensation] that ultimately led to MY being covertly implanted by a dentist - with some kind of Surveillance Device.
SGI has destroyed hundreds and even thousands lives and - they continue to - each day - Please CALL your MLA and complain about this NOW - If SGI continues their SPY ‘program’ any longer - YOU too may have to say ‘good-bye’ to all YOUR RIGHTS. PLEASE CALL Saskatchewan’s NEW Premier BRAD WALL - and do let this NEW leader know that YOUR RIGHTS and privacy are important and that an SGI without REAL REFORMS - is simply not acceptable. Please share this website URL with others and - please consider that...
The only thing worse than an Insurance Company - is a Government Insurance Company! ______________________________________________________________
Dear Non-Saskatchewan Residents:
You should know that if you do not reside in Saskatchewan - and are here visiting [doing business etc.,] and - [heaven forbid] you were to get into any accident - [a drunk driver hits you - or any at-fault accident that you are NOT at-fault for] - just know that YOU CANNOT sue - you will be 'processed' under the NDP no-fault legislation!
No payment for injury - no payment for pain and suffering and loss of quality of life - only permanent impairments are so-called compensated [lost wages and medical are not always paid either] the maximum payment under no-fault insurance for permanent impairment is less than $200.000 and - you would have to be so messed up to see it - you would not be in any state to care.
The fact is - the NDP government [under 'extreme pressure' from SGI in 1994-5] decided that it was not a problem that the legal rights of non-residents were wiped out - when they created the no-fault insurance legislation - so yes - even you a 'non-Saskatchewan resident' can be ill-affected by this SGI and it's no-fault nightmare!
______________________________________________________________
They have set-up shop elsewhere too:
http://www.sgi.sk.ca/news_releases/2006/june_20_2006.html
"The insurance agency in Saskatchewan, the socialist agency, can compete here if they want to." [Alberta Premier Ralph Klein, March 15, 2006]
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/saskatchewan/story/2006/03/16/klein-sgi060316.html
Yet - this NDP "socialist agency" refuses Saskatchewan residents PRIVATE INSURANCE choices!
SGI is in serious contradiction and conflict of interest - they want to sell insurance in provinces where there is private insurance but no private insurance choice for Saskatchewan residents!
In early September [2006] the NDP gathered for a national 'policy convention' - here is a leaked excerpt from their policy suggestions:
...THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the NDP is committed to actively campaign for and implement social ownership, including but not limited to the following industries: banking, communications, energy, health care, insurance, manufacturing, mass media, medical drugs, natural resources, transportation...
You can find more information on this here:
http://www.stephentaylor.ca/archives/000670.html
REALLY NOW - SHALL THE NEW GOVERNMENT OF SASKATCHEWAN RESOLVE THIS SGI/NDP IMPLANT ABUSE?
Without doubt Dr. Allison Falconer isn't impressed with this ongoing on-line picket/protest - for over 39 months now?
THERE FOR CERTAIN CAN NOW BE A PICKET OF Wascana DENTAL - ON THE PUBLIC STREET CALLED "ALBERT STREET" *DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF Wascana DENTAL - ON PUBLIC PROPERTY!
AS OF JANUARY 25, 2007 - THERE'S NOT AN OPPORTUNITY TO STOP THIS LAWFUL AND LEGITIMATE *PICKET/PROTEST WITH ANY FURTHER ABUSES OF S. 810 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE.
Dr. Allison Falconer and SGI cannot file an action within the civil courts - for an injunction to STOP MY INTERNET PROTEST.
The fact is Dr. Allison Falconer knows [it's even noted within her police statement] that if they go into any civil court for an injunction to close down this site or any other sites I create - they would be unable to get one - as the court would decide the evidence on a balance of probability.
I also would then have the opportunity to file my own counter-suit - why hasn't this yet happened? Instead all the failed efforts to stop [with a peace bond process] my protest...
In her original complaints to police in 2004-2005 Dr. Falconer more than once recored lies within her sworn police statements and pointing this out in a civil court would further trounce Dr. Falconer's credibility!
It's me today - with this implant - shall it soon be all SGI clients with their cars:
In Britain, the government recently decided to deploy global positioning system (GPS) technology to track every vehicle in the U.K. every minute of the day. Just as GPS sensors are mandated for use in every cell phone in the near future in the United States (for our safety, of course), Britain will mandate the use of a GPS sensor in every car. ``Has Reginald White arrived at the grocery store yet?'' will become a question answerable by the security division of Britain's DMV.
Read more:
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/1229-35.htm
...the ubiquitous cellphone makes communication on the move easy -- but it has a downside, in that it can be used theoretically by government agencies to pinpoint an individual's location.
Read more:
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0223-03.htm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why wouldn't the now defeated PROVINCIAL government do the right thing by me [AND the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms]? Is it that Lorne Calvert and the NDP were unethical? Looks like that!
Good questions?
I have been arrested THREE TIMES [without the results they desired!] because of SGI and this abuse [and other SGI abuses too] and - I've been very much degraded and made to constantly feel in a kind of state of terror since 2002.
I trust that the Police now understand this and - they shall not again be so inclined - even at the insistence of the Justice Department - which agency seemed to be trying to help the implant coordinators evade responsibility - by trouncing my legal rights.
Real nice 'reality' that I'm still forced to be living within?
Dr. Allison Falconer had her chance as she manipulated her way into a day in court - with a bogus peace bond application - meant to both degrade me and - to attempt to have this internet protesting stopped and - any other protesting eliminated. It failed.
Just think about the [always] better example down south - in America I could sue SGI and Dr. Allison Falconer for 125 million dollars [or more] - but here in the sticks of Canada - WHAT are our human rights worth!?
To quote the Saskatchewan Privacy Act:Violation of privacy
2 It is a tort, actionable without proof of damage, for a person wilfully and without claim of right, to violate the privacy of another person. R.S.S. 1978, c.P-24, s.2.
Crown is bound
11 The Crown is bound by this Act. R.S.S. 1978, c.P-24, s.11.
To turn aside the right of a man before the face of the Most High, To subvert a man in his cause, the Lord approveth not. [Lamentations 3.35-36]
Many seek the ruler's favour; but a man's judgment cometh from the LORD. [Proverbs 29.26]
"...Whether or not you work for a public body, if you have an opinion or view about another person, that view or opinion material is the personal information of the data subject, not the author..." [Saskatchewan Information and Privacy Commissioner Report F-2006-004, dated November 29, 2006]
Read more:
http://www.oipc.sk.ca/reviews.htm
http://www.bloggingtories.ca/forums/viewtopic.php?p=7257#7257
Dr. Allison Falconer [A HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATOR] MUST FILE IN CIVIL COURT FOR AN INJUNCTION TO ELIMINATE ANY PICKETS – THE QUESTION HAS BEEN AND - STILL IS – WHY HASN’T THIS BEEN THE COURSE TAKEN?
In fact she was told by a provincial court judge that I have a right to protest her dental practice!
CIVIL COURTS DISCERN EVIDENCE ON THE BALANCE OF PROBABILITY AND – THAT ISN’T FORTUITOUS FOR DR. ALLISON FALCONER'S [NOW VERY] CONFLICTED LEGAL POSITION.
ALTERNATELY – SHE CAN AT LAST PRESSURE WHOMEVER CONSCRIPTED THIS PROFESSIONALLY UNTOWARD JUNE 05, 2002 PROCEDURE - TO RESOLVE IT [AND THUS END THIS LEGITIMATE PICKET].
I SHOULDN’T HAVE HAD TO ENDURE ‘ANY’ OF THIS – EVEN NOW – I HOPE THAT AT LAST THE CONSCRIPTORS SHALL CONTACT ME AND - HONORABLY - SETTLE/RESOLVE THIS LONG-SUFFERING MATTER.
THIS SO-CALLED MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL BETTER UNDERSTAND THAT THIS INTERNET PROTEST IS EXPANDING TO OTHER SITES AND THERE IS ONLY ONE LEGITIMATE WAY TO END THIS.
YouTube Promo-videos for this website do play better at Youtube - you may view all videos at 'spy implant' a youtube channel - here:
http://www.youtube.com/spyimplant
Thank-you for visiting my protest website!
___________________________________________________________
In Loving Memory of the Dearest Friend
1927-2007
___________________________________________________________
